Yeah, that's the sense I'm getting too. Too bad, really, cuz it's without a doubt the most polished of all the wikis I've looked at (and I've looked at LOTS). Cheers. Fil
On 4 June 2010 18:10, OQ <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Filippo A. Salustri <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Thanks. I'll take it under advisement. > > Simply put, I'd prefer to have certain collections of pages that I can > > control both the visibility and the editability. > > Cheers. > > Fil > > Then I'd suggest not mediawiki. While extensions may or may not be > secure, mediawiki in itself was not designed for fine grained access > control so there are no guarantees that your data will be secure, or > that the functionality wont be broken in subsequent releases. > > _______________________________________________ > MediaWiki-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l > -- Filippo A. Salustri, Ph.D., P.Eng. Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Ryerson University 350 Victoria St, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada Tel: 416/979-5000 ext 7749 Fax: 416/979-5265 Email: [email protected] http://deseng.ryerson.ca/~fil/ _______________________________________________ MediaWiki-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
