Thank you for your explanation. Especially to b) I have a question.

What special version of mediawiki is wikipedia running?

And is it generally useful to use the development version of mediawiki
instead of the official stable releases?

robert

2010/9/10 Platonides <[email protected]>:
> [email protected] wrote:
>> I really thank you for this hint. That was exactly the problem. Now it
>> works flawlessly. This was also the point I wondered about that I
>> don't have the same buttons within the editor than wikipedia has.
>>
>> So is it generally recommended to use the development trunk version of
>> extensions even when I have mediawiki 1.16.0 and not the svn version
>> in use?
>>
>> I always took the adapted version of the extensions.
>>
>> robert
>
> No, not generally recommended. It could be that it didn't work in 1.16.
> But in this case, a) The UsabilityInititative extension has got a lot of
> work  b) Wikipedia is running a version quite similar to 1.16 c) 1.16
> had that nasty bug
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MediaWiki-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
>

_______________________________________________
MediaWiki-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l

Reply via email to