Platonides wrote: > > nakohdo: You cannot make some templates subst by not using subst. >
Thanks for clarification. Yes, a thought reading parser is still on my wishlist ;-) A follow-up question, though: Technically speaking "subst:" is a parser function, isn't it? Could I a least create an alias for it (by modifying magic words?) which is more meaningful for non English speakers? tia Frank -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Hiding-%22subst%3A%22-syntax-inside-a-template-possible--tp30711149p30717093.html Sent from the WikiMedia General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ MediaWiki-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
