On 11/12/11 00:27, Jens Wille wrote: > but what did work, though, is a plain `convert` (without actually > changing anything) and uploading that instead. this way it must > have gotten rid of any "garbage" there might have been.
It will have compressed it with a different dictionary, not matching that specific sequence. > so, thanks > again. for me the problem is solved :) as far as the database issue > is concerned i don't know... to be honest, as long as it doesn't > affect me, i don't really care. i just don't understand what it's > doing there. > > cheers > jens Do you know what was the old value of img_metadata? _______________________________________________ MediaWiki-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
