Jamie's answers are generally awesome (as is the Foreground skin), and hopefully this ends some spam for some time. As for the discussion on http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.science.linguistics.wikipedia.technical/80188 the problem is, as always with Mediawiki, the software's goals are too tied to Wikipedia (which is understandable, but a problem for those using it outside of it) and my fear is as Wikipedia goes so goes Mediawiki. If captcha is removed from Wikipedia I could see a future were the support for ConfirmEdit dies, which effectively would kill Mediawiki's effectiveness as a good software package. Maybe my fear is unfounded, but the shadow of Wikipedia is very, very large.
I would rather Wikipedia, and Mediawiki, add support for some more interesting approaches to captcha. See: http://www.josscrowcroft.com/demos/motioncaptcha/ (not in production yet, but an interesting captcha answer). <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.science.linguistics.wikipedia.technical/80188> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Mark A. Hershberger <[email protected]> wrote: > Tom <[email protected]> writes: > > > I've seen registrations climbing again, 20-30 a day. I've considered > > randomizing the output of the order with a mix of images of the > > position names with actual text. > > Most wikis don't have the benefit of a large, active user base filled > with monitors like Wikipedia does, of course, but people thinking about > captcha's should know that this came up today on wikitech-l: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.science.linguistics.wikipedia.technical/80188 > > -- > Mark A. Hershberger > NicheWork LLC > 717-271-1084 > > > _______________________________________________ > MediaWiki-l mailing list > To unsubscribe, go to: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l > _______________________________________________ MediaWiki-l mailing list To unsubscribe, go to: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
