I would disrecommend it - it's an effectively dead project, and the problems aren't fixable. rationalwiki.org took it on board, since WMF said it would be developed ... it still causes infuriating bugs (e.g. PHP out of memory generating watchlists for one user with a ridiculous watchlist) that we have no interest in tracking down. As soon as Flow is stable and can import LQT, we'll be doing so.
On 30 January 2015 at 14:13, Jason Ji <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > My team at the MITRE Corporation is considering using the LiquidThreads > (LQT) code base as a starting point for a new commenting extension we are > writing. We would either fork LQT and work directly on the existing code, > or at least use the code as inspiration or a basis for how to start > designing our own extension. > > I'm aware that development of LQT was canceled over three years ago - can > anyone shed some light on the backstory of why it was abandoned? If there > were some fundamental technical flaws with the extension, that would be > good for us to know if we shouldn't waste our time; on the other hand, if > it was more of a policy/philosophy reason, then that would also be good for > us to know, to see if that reasoning applies to our needs. > > Thanks! > > -- > Jason Ji > The MITRE Corporation > _______________________________________________ > MediaWiki-l mailing list > To unsubscribe, go to: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l _______________________________________________ MediaWiki-l mailing list To unsubscribe, go to: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
