All messages should be posted in plain text. HTML will be converted to attachments. The meditech-l web site is MTUsers.com ======================================
Title: Separate specimen replies
<<RE: [MEDITECH-L] Separate Specimen Order Rule for send out test>> <<RE: [MEDITECH-L] Separate Specimen Order Rule for send out test>> <<RE: [MEDITECH-L] Separate Specimen Order Rule for send out test>>
Adin Smith
Systems Analyst - Laboratory
Inland Northwest Health Services / IRM
509-232-8218
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Begin Message ---Did you know if you have LAB DTS 11422? I had this issue before a few year ago. I have a rule on PT. When the nursing ordered PT and CBC together the night before, CBC got cancelled at midnight run. This DTS fixed it.
Michael Chan
Humber river Regional Hospital
> Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:41:42 -0700
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [MEDITECH-L] Separate Specimen Order Rule for send out test
>
> All messages should be posted in plain text. HTML will be converted to
> attachments. The meditech-l web site is MTUsers.com
> ======================================
>
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! MSN Messenger
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Title: Separate Specimen Order Rule for send out test
We don’t have a Medinet interface, so I can’t speak to that. As I said, we use this in limited circumstances, but we have not encountered any real problems with it.
Rich Griffith
Coordinator, Info Mgmt, QM & Compliance
Hagerstown Medical Laboratory
Washington County Health System
Voice: 301-665-4906
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]-----Original Message-----
From: Smith, Adin F. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 4:50 PM
To: Rich Griffith
Subject: RE: [MEDITECH-L] Separate Specimen Order Rule for send out test
Rich,
Thanks for the reply.
I asked Meditech about this - they recommend not using this format - they say it causes problems with Medinet interfaces.
Have you heard any thing in regards to this?
Adin
From: Rich Griffith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 1:32 PM
To: Smith, Adin F.
Subject: RE: [MEDITECH-L] Separate Specimen Order Rule for send out testAdin: Actually, you can have one rule, with multiple lines, like this:
[f lord lab link test](1,"QUIN"),
[f lord lab link test](1,"OSMO"),
[f lord lab link test](1,"UOSM"),
[f lord lab link test](1,"xPROC"),
[f lord lab link test](1,"LIDO"),
[f lord lab link test](2,"INSU"),
[f lord lab link test](3,"BNP"),
[f lord lab link test](2,"xPTH-I"),
[f lord lab link test](2,"SCCM"),
[f lord lab link test](2,"xSFAST"),
[f lord lab link test](2,"PTH");
However, we use this for limited circumstances. Our reference tests have their own prefix, and that automatically generates a separate specimen number.
Rich Griffith
Coordinator, Info Mgmt, QM & Compliance
Hagerstown Medical Laboratory
Washington County Health System
Voice: 301-665-4906
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Smith, Adin F.
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 5:42 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [MEDITECH-L] Separate Specimen Order Rule for send out test
We have been using the following rule on send out tests so they get a separate specimen number - one rule attached to many tests.
[f lord print#]^PNUM,
[f lord lab link test](52,PNUM);
We have a recurring problem with tests getting rejected by the OE/Lab interface - with following error message: MSG: ORDER REJECTED No specimen data for LAB: C.
I can reproduce the error if there are two separate requisitions in OE, requested for same date & time, both with same prefix, and the send out requisition crosses the interface second. If interface test with order rule crosses first, the rule works.
Meditech says that the variable for the print number has not set up yet when the order reaches lab - so the order rejects. Their solution is to write individual rules as follows:
[f lord lab link test](53,"MNE");
where MNE is the test mnemonic.
Has anyone else seen this or have another way to write one rule that cover many tests. We are looking at having to create 180+ rules.
Adin Smith
Systems Analyst - Laboratory
Inland Northwest Health Services / IRM
509-232-8218
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
***** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE ***** This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
***** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE ***** This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Title: Separate Specimen Order Rule for send out test
Adin: Actually, you can have one rule, with multiple lines, like this:
[f lord lab link test](1,"QUIN"),
[f lord lab link test](1,"OSMO"),
[f lord lab link test](1,"UOSM"),
[f lord lab link test](1,"xPROC"),
[f lord lab link test](1,"LIDO"),
[f lord lab link test](2,"INSU"),
[f lord lab link test](3,"BNP"),
[f lord lab link test](2,"xPTH-I"),
[f lord lab link test](2,"SCCM"),
[f lord lab link test](2,"xSFAST"),
[f lord lab link test](2,"PTH");
However, we use this for limited circumstances. Our reference tests have their own prefix, and that automatically generates a separate specimen number.
Rich Griffith
Coordinator, Info Mgmt, QM & Compliance
Hagerstown Medical Laboratory
Washington County Health System
Voice: 301-665-4906
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Smith, Adin F.
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 5:42 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [MEDITECH-L] Separate Specimen Order Rule for send out test
We have been using the following rule on send out tests so they get a separate specimen number - one rule attached to many tests.
[f lord print#]^PNUM,
[f lord lab link test](52,PNUM);
We have a recurring problem with tests getting rejected by the OE/Lab interface - with following error message: MSG: ORDER REJECTED No specimen data for LAB: C.
I can reproduce the error if there are two separate requisitions in OE, requested for same date & time, both with same prefix, and the send out requisition crosses the interface second. If interface test with order rule crosses first, the rule works.
Meditech says that the variable for the print number has not set up yet when the order reaches lab - so the order rejects. Their solution is to write individual rules as follows:
[f lord lab link test](53,"MNE");
where MNE is the test mnemonic.
Has anyone else seen this or have another way to write one rule that cover many tests. We are looking at having to create 180+ rules.
Adin Smith
Systems Analyst - Laboratory
Inland Northwest Health Services / IRM
509-232-8218
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
***** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE ***** This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________ meditech-l mailing list [email protected] http://mtusers.com/mailman/listinfo/meditech-l
