All messages should be posted in plain text.  HTML will be converted to
attachments.    The meditech-l web site is MTUsers.com
======================================


 
Alex:
 
You make a very good point here. It's one we have considered.
Take for example the case of a child that is making frequent
repeat visits to deal with a cleft palate.  This patient needs
to go to our cranial-facial department and our speech therapy
department.
 
In a decentralized environment the patient's parents would make
one appointment with cranial-facial.  They then would go through
the phone tree again to make the associated speech therapy 
appointment.  Of course, they could be possibly forwarded.  However,
the onus of coordinating the timing of those appointments would be
on the patient, because each clinic is going to be naturaly focused
their own scheduling exigencies and preferences.
 
In a centralized environment, a single call would be placed.  The
scheduler would be responsible for making the appointments fit the
patient's needs.  By the way, getting authorizations would also be
handled at a single point in this environment as well.  So, the 
centralized environment offers opportunities and efficiences for
consolidation of effort that benefits the patient and the hospital.
 
The argument that the clinics know the medical ramifications of
the scheduling process best is a strong point as well.  There are
no easy answers here.
 
By the way, I obviously completely disagree with Doug Davison's
comment, "this is not the place nor the time for [this conversation]."
This is clearly a perfect forum for discussing implementation of
medical information systems, in particular how to best utilize Meditech's
appointment scheduling module.
 
Thomas Stephen Laxar
Coordinator, Hospital Information Systems
Children's Hospital Oakland
510-428-3833
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
 Thur Apr 27, 2006 8:55 pm             
From: "Alex Anderson" <Ale
 
Subject: RE: [MEDITECH-L] Centralized Scheduling
From: "Alex Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 16:19:26 -0400
 
Wouldn't it be nice to have the ability to look at his issue from a
patient perspective?  Personally, I would like to have one phone number
to call or one website to visit to see all of my appointments.  I would
love to have the person who is scheduling my PT aware of my CT and my
Ortho appointments.  It would even be nice if my PCP could schedule my
appointments at the hospital.  The CWS module whether you are in client
server or Magic can be set-up so just about anybody can schedule
appointments, if you take the time and build it so other people can use
it. 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mary Rozenboom
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 9:06 AM
To: JOHN HUGHES; Ann Skinner; Randy Hart; Meditech-L List (E-mail);
Patricia Cornwell
Subject: RE: [MEDITECH-L] Centralized Scheduling
 
All messages should be posted in plain text.  HTML will be converted to
attachments.    The meditech-l web site is MTUsers.com
 
 
John,
 We have therapists who have specialized in certain areas as I mentioned
in my first email. When we get so spread out and I know how this goes in
the hospital field as well as many areas of business. Employees change,
and to keep everyone up to speed as to who to schedule with for each
different specialty; is challenging enough just in Rehab.
 It is definitely to the benefit of our patients to have them schedule
correctly with the proper therapist their first visit. That isn't just
owning an area that is the best use of our resources.
Mary
 
-----Original Message-----
From: JOHN HUGHES [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 7:41 AM
To: Ann Skinner; Randy Hart; Meditech-L List (E-mail); Patricia
Cornwell; Mary Rozenboom
Subject: RE: [MEDITECH-L] Centralized Scheduling
 
my bad, didn't mean to offend ya just state the black & white of it from
a business perspective. again, your comments sound just like when nurses
had to begin documenting on the computer trashing their outdated paper
forms. "the story will get lost!" they cried...
 
implementation requires cooperation, not dictation from either "side".
team play, remember?
 
out!
jh
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Ann Skinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 7:50 AM
To: Randy Hart; JOHN HUGHES; Meditech-L List (E-mail); Patricia
Cornwell; Mary Rozenboom
Subject: RE: [MEDITECH-L] Centralized Scheduling
 
 
John,
Sorry, but this comment reflects a total lack of awareness of the issues
that are present for various departments.  Its not about the FTE, its
about the ability to have a level of control over your schedule for a
professional who knows more about the clinical issues related to how the
schedule is put together and the ramifications, than a clerk in an
office in another part of the building, or even another town.  People
who only concern themselves with "the purely business perspective" make
it extremely difficult for clinicians to do their jobs effectively.
Calling people who have a legitiimate concern about the way they treat
their patients passive aggressive is unecessarily insulting, and totally
dismissive.
Ann
 
>>> "JOHN HUGHES" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3:30:52 PM Wednesday, April 26,
2006 >>>
All messages should be posted in plain text.  HTML will be converted to
attachments.    The meditech-l web site is MTUsers.com
 
 
 
i can't help but laugh as each dept. gets freaked out at the concept of
centralized scheduling. "oh no! i'll lose my .75fte."
from a purely business perspective it's a no brainer done deal; just
getting the passive-aggressives to get used to it is where most folks
are at. surgery seems to be the toughest egg to crack...$$$.
 
reminds me of nurses (and administration) balking at the concept of
workstations in the patient rooms or just moving to nursing documenting
on the computer at all...
 
as always we in healthcare change albeit painfully & slowly.
 
take care all.
john
 
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mary Rozenboom
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 5:54 PM
To: Cornwell, Patricia; Randy Hart; Meditech-L List (E-mail)
Subject: RE: [MEDITECH-L] Centralized Scheduling
 
 
All messages should be posted in plain text.  HTML will be converted to
attachments.    The meditech-l web site is MTUsers.com
 
 
 
I totally agree with Pat on Rehabilitation Services, from start to
finish of her paragraph it is identical here in our Rehab Department.
Recurring patients, changes in patients schedule, and Staffing schedules
as well as Staff specializing in certain areas Vertigo, Women's Health,
Orthotics, TMJ..etc. The scheduler in the Rehab Department knows her
people, and their specialties.
 
Mary Rozenboom, Rehab
Pella Regional Health Center
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cornwell, Patricia
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 7:59 AM
To: Randy Hart; Meditech-L List (E-mail)
Subject: RE: [MEDITECH-L] Centralized Scheduling
 
All messages should be posted in plain text.  HTML will be converted to
attachments.    The meditech-l web site is MTUsers.com
 
 
 
Speaking for Rehabilitation Services, I definitely feel that we are
better off being decentralized. We are using CWS, it is our third
scheduling system.  We schedule for about 80 physical, occupational and
speech therapists who provide inpatient, outpatient and Home Health
services at two facilities.  Our KEY resource in scheduling is staff,
rather than machines and/or rooms.  We are constantly changing
availabilities for vacations, sick time, meetings, etc.  Since most of
our patients are seen 2 - 3 x / week for 4 - 6 weeks, they are
constantly making changes for their appointments.  It is very important
for the data to be up to date so we don't double book.  Quite often, a
supervisor needs to be consulted during a scheduling process.  This
would be for unusual problems (diagnoses) or a physician calling to get
someone in "now." I cannot imagine relying on Central Scheduling.
Pat Cornwell
Director of Rehab Services
Palos Community Hospital
 
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Randy Hart
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 1:47 PM
To: Meditech-L List (E-mail)
Subject: [MEDITECH-L] Centralized Scheduling
 
 
All messages should be posted in plain text.  HTML will be converted to
attachments.    The meditech-l web site is MTUsers.com
 
 
 
Anyone willing to share information pertaining to their implementing a
Centralized Scheduling Department.  What are the pros and cons?   Has it
worked?  Was it received well by Medical Staff?  What departments do you
schedule for?    Any information would be appreciated.  We are
definitely going forward with this endeavor.  We presently use CWS, MSM
but everything is decentrailzed.  Multiple departments scheduling their
own.
 
Randy Hart, System Support Analyst
Duncan Regional Hospital
Duncan, OK 73533
Ph: (580)251-8939
Fx: (580)251-8953
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
_______________________________________________
meditech-l mailing list
[email protected]
http://mtusers.com/mailman/listinfo/meditech-l
 
This message and accompanying documents are covered by the Electronic
Communications Privacy Act and the Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act. This message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
information that is confidential and/or privileged. If the reader of
this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please notify the sender immediately by e-mail, and delete the original
message. Thank you.
 
 
 
_______________________________________________
meditech-l mailing list
[email protected]
http://mtusers.com/mailman/listinfo/meditech-l
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the use of the intended recipient(s), and may contain legally
privileged and confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please do not read, copy, or use it, and do not disclose it
to others. Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to
this message, then delete it from your system, and destroy all copies.
Thank you.
 
_______________________________________________
meditech-l mailing list
[email protected]
http://mtusers.com/mailman/listinfo/meditech-l
 
_______________________________________________
meditech-l mailing list
[email protected]
http://mtusers.com/mailman/listinfo/meditech-l
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the use of the intended recipient(s), and may contain legally
privileged and confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please do not read, copy, or use it, and do not disclose it
to others. Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to
this message, then delete it from your system, and destroy all copies.
Thank you.
 
_______________________________________________
meditech-l mailing list
[email protected]
http://mtusers.com/mailman/listinfo/meditech-l
 
 
 
_______________________________________________
meditech-l mailing list
[email protected]
http://mtusers.com/mailman/listinfo/meditech-l
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Return-Path: <"Alex Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
Received: from thompsonhealth.org> by cho.org;  Thu, 27 Apr 2006 20:55:38 0000
Received: from smtp2.mail.cho.org
        ([192.168.1.39])
        by smtp2.in.cho.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 20:55:34 -0700
X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1146196531-4272-322-0
X-Barracuda-URL: http://192.168.1.39:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi
Received: from prosonic.com (prosonic.com [204.202.252.254])
        by smtp2.mail.cho.org (Spam Firewall) with SMTP
        id 85A8F2000539; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 20:55:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prosonic.iserver.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by prosonic.com (8.13.6/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k3S3ot3N044313;
        Fri, 28 Apr 2006 03:51:09 GMT
Received: from mail.thompsonhealth.org (mail.thompsonhealth.com
        [204.69.151.232])
        by prosonic.com (8.13.6/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k3RKJaEQ012538
        for <[email protected]>; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 20:19:40 GMT
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset"us-ascii"
X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: [MEDITECH-L] Centralized Scheduling
Subject: RE: [MEDITECH-L] Centralized Scheduling
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 16:19:26 -0400
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [MEDITECH-L] Centralized Scheduling
Thread-Index: AcZp8QRFy6cI/eWAQ8OhFTX5oV8O4AABmjdQAAD4RrAADlkBQA
From: "Alex Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mary Rozenboom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        "JOHN HUGHES" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        "Ann Skinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        "Randy Hart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        "Meditech-L List \(E-mail\)" <[email protected]>,
        "Patricia Cornwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by prosonic.com id
        k3RKJaEQ012538
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 20:26:52 +0000
Cc:
X-BeenThere: [email protected]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email list for Meditech users <meditech-l.MTUsers.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mtusers.com/mailman/listinfo/meditech-l>,
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://prosonic.iserver.net/pipermail/meditech-l>
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <http://mtusers.com/mailman/listinfo/meditech-l>,
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.1733 1.0000 -0.9713
        INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.1733 1.0000 -0.9713
X-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam Firewall at mail.cho.org
X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -0.97
X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE-0.97 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL2.0 
QUARANTINE_LEVEL4.0 KILL_LEVEL7.0 tests
X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.02, rules version 3.0.11500
        Rule breakdown below pts rule name              description
        ---- ---------------------- 
--------------------------------------------------
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
_______________________________________________
meditech-l mailing list
[email protected]
http://mtusers.com/mailman/listinfo/meditech-l

Reply via email to