On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 14:53, Henri Bergius <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Andrew Flegg <[email protected]> wrote:
>> * IMHO, it's technically sub-optimal (since we can't do decaying
>> karma - which wasn't an original requirement but might've
>> solved some of the problems experienced a year or so ago)
>
> Actually, Karma decay is not difficult with the current implementation
> (Social News does it already for "karma" of individual news items), it
> is just that I haven't understood that as a requirement.
Well, last time I asked - I think it was on IRC so exact references
will be hard to come up with - it was said it would be hard because of
the way that the whole figure is recalculated each time, rather than
doing a delta. That's backed up by this post by Dave Neary when it was
first suggested, back in 2008:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/maemo/community/41981?do=post_view_threaded#41981
> So sure, if we want Karma decay (or time-based Karma appreciation),
> I'll be more than happy to implement that for maemo.org. Could the
> Council take the ball to push this into the Sprint agenda?
s/appreciation/depreciation/ ;-)
Anyway, there's a wider discussion about the sprint process ongoing, see:
http://maemo.org/community/council/maemo-org_sprint_process-future_discussion/
Cheers,
Andrew
--
Andrew Flegg -- mailto:[email protected] | http://www.bleb.org/
Maemo Community Council chair
_______________________________________________
Meego-community mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-community
