On Mar 15, 2010, at 9:59 AM, Quim Gil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ext Andreas Osowski wrote:
>> Hello everyone, I shall announce to you the first meego repository
>> working group meeting. Based upon the votes received so far it'll be
>> on Sunday next week (21. March). The time has yet to be decided upon;
>> it'd be great if those who added themselves to the list of
>> contributors on the proposal wiki page would add themselves to this
>> doodle poll (and of course others who know about the current
>> Packaging/Repository aspects of MeeGo, e.g. Intel or Nokia
>> employees!!!): http://doodle.com/wg3pp9yyxcmfk7sd
>>
>> Agenda: We haven't really decided upon anything yet, however it'd be
>> great if we could have some Nokia/Intel official who's currently
>> involved with packaging to inform us about the current situation etc.
>> (maybe anaZ -- Anas Nashif? he wrote the Packaging/Guidelines wiki
>> page)
>>
>> 1. Scope and area of this working group
>> 2. ... ?
I think we should address:
- How do packages get from the build system (whatever that is) to the
repos
* Do developers upload to the repos?
* Does built software get pulled into the repos automatically?
- Will repo layouts reflect products
* Do we need an IVI repo? A video repo? A desktop repo?
* Do we use kickstart files to define repos?
- Opportunities for QA
* Are there analogs to debian's puiparts or other QA?
* Do we set up tools to test the packages in the repos? In the
build system?
* Are there tools in the rpm world that do what debian's
lintian does?
Jeremiah_______________________________________________
MeeGo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
