On Tuesday 16 March 2010 14:47:58 Bernd Stramm wrote: > Another point of view is that the excellent portability provided by Qt > comes from the libraries. Tying this to any particular IDE is really > bad. It generates programming styles and project build structures that > have nothing to to with the Qt libraries or the application problem. > This is not a good thing, regardless of how fine a product Qt Creator > is.
>From what I understand, MADDE is something quite separate from Qt Creator. Qt Creator is fairly modular, and in this case, is extended to handle MADDE. This does imply loosing the ability of calling MADDE with the appropriate paramers yourself should you not like Qt Creator for some reason, and I hope the MADDE team keeps the CLI mode in the future, too. As for styles and project build structures... well, from my experience Qt creator is fairly agnostic in that regard, especially if you use qmake and .pro files. From all the all-in-one development enviroments I have used, Qt Creator is definitely in the less-intrusive group. Regards, Attila _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
