On 2010-03-25, at 5:40 AM, Jeremiah Foster wrote: >> >> On Mar 25, 2010, at 10:02 AM, Ville Ilvonen wrote: >> >>> On 3/25/10 10:13 AM, ext Sivan Greenberg wrote: >>>> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Ville Ilvonen >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 3/23/10 12:40 PM, ext Sivan Greenberg wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> How do you think we can combine manual efforts into this ? >>>>> >>> >>> Right, it traditionally goes in this direction. I think it's better if >>> automated testing is designed for automation - rather than human value in >>> testing is tried to be replaced with automation. In practice this means >>> that when you plan automated you consider things like execute tests for >>> every change, in nightly tests and so on. As in continuous integration >>> practices to get feedback fast and often. >> >> How does 'spectacle' fit in with the continuous integration? Spectacle >> appears to be a new tool for package management and I wonder what language >> it is written and what hooks it has to manage the automated installation and >> uninstallation of packages. >>
This is not a package management tool. It is just a packaging assistant that helps with very common packaging scenarios. After defining package meta data and packaging information in a meta data file it creates the spec files for rpm packages. Anas >> Jermeiah > > > _______________________________________________ > MeeGo-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
_______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
