On Sun, 28 Mar 2010, 08:37:43 BST, [email protected] wrote: > > It sounds like a good description of the goals of the "Extras / Downloads > team" > (final name to be defined) proposed at > http://wiki.meego.com/Community_working_group#Web_infrastructure
Indeed. > Is there any reason why this team couldn't be part of the Community WG? It's > all > about community software. Well, isn't everything MeeGo about community software? ;-) AIUI, the Repository WG would also define how MeeGo's core repositories interacts with the community repos. As we've seen over the years in Maemo, in particular recently with PR1.2 and Qt 4.6, there's a requirement for very close collaboration between the core and community repos. My gut says that the "repositoriness" is a more defining factor than the "communitiness"; although there's obviously an overlap. However, perhaps this strengthens the case for another body, apart from the benevolent dictators, sitting across all the working groups. Or, alternatively, ensuring that a member of the CWG sits in the RWG. Cheers, Andrew -- Andrew Flegg -- mailto:[email protected] | http://www.bleb.org/ _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
