for example: rpm -q --changelog glibc or what ever rpm name, you could find many redhat guys.
2010/4/2 Zhang, Austin <[email protected]> > >…most of them come from Fedora 13, > > Not sure how do you get this conclusion? Meego is not derived from any > else. > > > > >so I think fedora 13 is the prefer DEV ENV. > > Several (not only one specific distro) can be used as development > environment. > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *An Yang > *Sent:* Friday, April 02, 2010 11:56 AM > *To:* Samir Faci (Dev) > *Cc:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [MeeGo-dev] Building the Meego Dev Environment > > > > There are 287 rpm packages in day one release, most of them come from > Fedora 13, so I think fedora 13 is the prefer DEV ENV. > > 在 2010-04-01四的 11:22 -0600，Samir Faci (Dev)写道： > > > > I'm trying to follow this guide: > > > > http://wiki.meego.com/Developing_in_a_Meego_Environment > > > > Some of the packages seems to be missing in Ubuntu. The pykickstart > > in particular. I'm sure I can check it out and do it manually, but > > just an overall question. > > > > Is it recommended to use FC to build Meego? I'm just curious if meego > > is mainly being developed in FC, Centos or something along those > > lines. I can match up the nokia dev environment if it just avoid > > potential issues. > > > > Also something of note: > > > > http://wiki.meego.com/Image_Creation#Requirements (If you install > > image_creation once it's installed it installs a binary named > > mic-image-creator not > > mic2-image-creator ) > > > > I installed both the binary version and the git checkout and I believe > > the docs might be a bit out of date. > > > > -- > > Samir Faci > > *insert title* > > fortune | cowsay -f /usr/share/cows/tux.cow > > > > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
