ext Dave Neary wrote: > Hi, > > Quim Gil wrote: >> I really believe that it is useful to discuss all topics well in advance >> before throwing them to the TSG agenda. I keep repeating myself that >> mantra from Arjan: "If a topic reaches the TSG it means that the rest of >> channels have failed". > > Sorry to hijack the thread - just wondering whether you feel there is > more discussion needed on MeeGo documentation licensing - it feels like > this is an issue that can be rubber-stamped at this stage.
I feel Dawn and Ibrahim have spent plenty of time on this and they should be the ones deciding how to proceed. > If so, then the obvious next step is to request that Maemo documentation > which is currently licenced GNU FDL change its licensing to match > MeeGo's - what would you suggest is the best way to start that process? That is the easy part. File a bug at bugs.maemo.org and CC me as soon as it is clear what is the license you want. I wonder though how relevant is the Maemo 5 documentation in the MeeGo context, but we can discuss this elsewhere - in the bug report? -- Quim Gil open source advocate MeeGo Devices @ Nokia _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
