David,

A few questions/comments:

1) It is not clear whether this is policy for Meego core packages or for
community packages (or both).  I assume it is Core, as that is all that
exists at the moment.  And if we end up with multiple community
repositories there may well end up with multiple policies.

2) Four days is not long to spot, review and comment on a proposal if one is
not a paid developer.  For example, I have been travelling doing my day job
all this week and have had no time to look at this list since Monday.  If
this is just Core policy that is probably fine -- all Core package
maintianers are expected to be paid developers, who track the mailing list
as part of their job.

3) You really need to be clear where/how discussion is expected to happen
(this is separate from the issue fo where the approved policy is published). 
Personally I would prefer the mailing list (proposed content changes may be
in a Wiki page but discussion should be on the list).  That is probably
partly becuase I have yet to discover how I tell the Wiki to email me on
changes to a particular page!

Graham
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev

Reply via email to