Em Sexta-feira 28. Maio 2010, às 23.27.56, JD Zheng escreveu:
> What I am questioning is how decision was made and if decision changes over
> time silently.

The decision was probably something like "we need some apps. Shall we spend 
10-100 man-years redeveloping new ones or shall we take some existing stuff?"

If the apps work fine, let's use them. I'd much rather have MeeGo 1.0 now than 
wait another year until things were ready,

The same applies to any app: if it works fine, use it.

But, as time passes and the UI/UX evolves, maybe things will no longer work 
fine and will require adaptation or replacement.

What's more important is the cross-UX point of view: if you want to develop an 
app that adapts to all UX and has access to all of the API, you should follow 
the recommendation.

Of course, you're free to ignore the recommendation and go with another route.
-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
  Senior Product Manager - Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks
      PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
      E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C  966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
MeeGo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev

Reply via email to