On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Janne Karhunen <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> MeeGo security architecture will be base on Maemo6 (Harmattan) model > >> and codebase. More details about that: > >> > >> http://fosdem.org/2010/schedule/events/maemo > >> > >> Nokia is open sourcing the security componets starting now. > > > > "now"? Cool, where is the code? > > Hiding behind me ;). Interestingly, we have a battle going on with > our legal about it and have to change the name of the whole thing > before posting the patches. Unforeseen thing really, sorry about > that. > > Me & Elena & Dmitry will be giving talks about it in OLS and in > security summit unless the travel requests bounce. If you show > up this year I guess we can have a chat about it. I will post the > initial set of patches once the name hassle is sorted (prior to > OLS anyway). > > Effective bits in access control are quite simple and similar to > SMACK. Check the linux-security-module discussion for starters. > The 'real' difference between smack and this is that we support > multiple task labels and the fact that we don't allow the task to > change it's own security context. > Multiple task labels for multiple role assignment I guess ...? What about the verification of subjects like in EVM? What about the secure boot part? What about adherence to existing standards? -- Shaz
_______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
