On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 18:25 +0100, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Wednesday 23 June 2010 13:39:22 Patrick Ohly wrote: > > But I'm far from being an expert on this. I don't know whether all > > projects with D-Bus interfaces already have the necessary QDBus > > annotations. > > They probably don't. But it's a matter of whether you need them or not. Like > Rusty said, you can just comment them out.
But that implies that every user of the .xml files has to maintain a local copy, possibly repeating the same work that someone else has already done. IMHO this is okay as a short-term solution, but in order to have it work out-of-the-box, the upstream .xml files need to be patched. > One thing I've wanted to do but never had the time was to have an "overlay" > system for the XML files, which would append extra information, like the C++ > type that matches the complex signature. That sounds like an improvement over copying the file, in particular when different apps prefer to have different mappings to local types, but still doesn't address the "out-of-the-box" aspect. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
