On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 17:48:06 -0600, Randall Arnold <[email protected]> wrote: > > > ----- Original message ----- > > From: "Dirk Hohndel" <[email protected]> > > To: "Nicola Mfb" <[email protected]>, "Development for the MeeGo > > Project (discussion list)" <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] After handset day one - a plea for openness > > Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 16:32:54 -0700 > > > > > > > > > * not official support of meego on some hardware is community driven? > > > > Again, the default builds that we provide are optimized for Atom - I > > don't think there's anything wrong with that. It's fairly straight > > forward to build for other platforms if you need that, but I think it is > > not a reasonable request that we shouldn't optimize for our platform. > > > > I guess this is one part I don't quite get, so forgive my ignorance. > Given the eventual breadth of MeeGo, shouldn't the default be agnostic > to vendor-specific optimizations? Then of course there would be an > Atom-optimized build from Intel... ARM-specific from others... et > al...
Any company that wants to do vendor specific optimizations is welcome to step up and do that. Intel has done so. /D -- Dirk Hohndel Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
