The question is too big.... let's say in technology and business ways. From techonlogy viewpoint, I like meego is better than android. Even there are so many android players, but linux has more.
From business viewpoint, we need final product. Nokia seems the only one vendor to provide meego mobile phone so far. Hawk > ----- 原始邮件 ----- > 发件人: "Felipe Contreras" <felipe.contre...@nokia.com> > 收件人: digis...@ovi.com, meego-dev@meego.com > 主题: Re: [MeeGo-dev] Difference between MeeGo and Android? > 日期: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 17:21:33 +0300 > > >digis...@ovi.com wrote: > > So far, what would you say are the main difference between MeeGo and > > Android? > > These are the ones I find important: > > Companies involved: > * Android: Intel, ARM, Marvell, Qualcomm, Nvidia, Texas Instruments, > Broadcom, NXP, PacketVideo, Google, HTC, LG, Motorola, Samsung, > Ericsson, Toshiba, Dell, Acer, Garmin (and more) > * MeeGo: Intel, Nokia > > Products released: > * Android: more than 200 > * MeeGo: 0 > > Technologies used: > * Android: mostly proprietary > * MeeGo: mostly shared with FOSS community > > Using Linux?: > * Android: kind of a fork > * MeeGo: yes, close to upstream > > > What does it do better? And what does it do worse? Benefits vs. > > shortcomings? > > Without seeing a few MeeGo devices, I'm not sure much can be said about > what MeeGo would do better. > > -- > Felipe Contreras > _______________________________________________ > MeeGo-dev mailing list > MeeGo-dev@meego.com > http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev > -------------------------------------------------------------- Ovi Mail: Making email access easy http://mail.ovi.com _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list MeeGo-dev@meego.com http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev