Atilla, On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Attila Csipa <[email protected]> wrote: > Just a smallish note from someone who follows PyQt development fairly closely > - I would not be surprised if those new libs (or at least a major subset of > them) popped up as supported under PyQt. My OBS-foo is not yet strong enough > to allow me to tinker with bindings under MeeGo, but it is on my (rather > longish) to-do list, as, though some might disagree, I still feel there is > some advantage of having two bindings. OTOH I do think MeeGo should (have) > push(ed) for full platform level python availability from day 1, picking a > preferred/official binding if necessary. >
Just to second that- and I know we've already discussed this on IRC, but I strongly support the idea to have full platform support for Python, to the extend of reaching the OVI store and more "monetary" (but not necessary paid) style distribution channels. I actually agree with every word , and couldn't say this better. The issue is I guess with maintainer ship, who when and how? (having two frameworks strictly speaking suggests 2 maintainership efforts?) Sivan _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
