Le vendredi 13 août 2010 à 22:33 +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz a écrit : > Greg KH a écrit : > > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 09:20:47PM +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote: > >> Greg KH a écrit : > >>> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 05:37:04PM +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote: > >>>> Foster, Dawn M a écrit : > >>>>> On Aug 12, 2010, at 3:42 AM, David Greaves wrote: > >>>>> This is the way open source projects are supposed to work. The > >>>>> people who start the project pick a manageable set of hardware to > >>>>> get us started just like when Linus only supported 386 with AT > >>>>> drives in the first version of the Linux kernel because that's > >>>>> what he was using at the time[1]. [1] > >>>>> http://www.linux.org/people/linus_post.html > >>>> Sorry, but this argument is completely wrong: At the time Linus > >>>> started Linux, porting to other hardware was a hug task that > >>>> involved years of work. Today, every large distribution routinely > >>>> build generic i686 build. Why not Meego ? > >>> Speed. Seriously, go measure it with it turned off, it is very > >>> noticable. And on these tiny netbooks, you need all the speed you can > >>> get. > >>> > >>> There's a reason MeeGo is the fastest booting and running of _all_ > >>> distros out there at the moment, and this is one of them. > >> Easy to say, but what real facts can you show to support your claim ? > > > > I just got a report from someone today that analized the boot times of > > all of the currently released distros, and MeeGo was the fastest. > > Please show, this is interesting.
And here it comes : http://blog.crozat.net/2010/08/some-boot-time-comparison-meego-is.html -- Frederic Crozat <[email protected]> Novell _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
