yeah, agree on that. I would prefer meego-packaging, since meego-dev is completely off-topic in this regard.
Anas On 2010-08-17, at 1:28 PM, David Greaves wrote: > So, having argued for the reply-to on meego-dev and -community to *not* be > munged I'd like to suggest that meego-commits *is* munged and reply-to is set > to meego-dev or meego-packaging. > > The rationale is that few people will want to track the meego-commits stream > directly (many of which are autogenerated) but almost every reply thread > raises an issue which has relevance to a wider audience in the > devel/packaging lists. See some in [1] > It also seems to makes most sense to have those conversations archived in a > meaningful list. > > I suggest meego-dev as a more generic list. > > David > [1] http://lists.meego.com/pipermail/meego-commits/2010-August/thread.html > -- > "Don't worry, you'll be fine; I saw it work in a cartoon once..." > _______________________________________________ > MeeGo-packaging mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-packaging _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
