On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 3:28 PM, David Greaves <[email protected]> wrote: > So, having argued for the reply-to on meego-dev and -community to *not* be > munged I'd like to suggest that meego-commits *is* munged and reply-to is > set to meego-dev or meego-packaging. > > The rationale is that few people will want to track the meego-commits stream > directly (many of which are autogenerated) but almost every reply thread > raises an issue which has relevance to a wider audience in the > devel/packaging lists. See some in [1] > It also seems to makes most sense to have those conversations archived in a > meaningful list. > > I suggest meego-dev as a more generic list.
I disagree. Some replies belong to meego-commits, some to meego-packaging, and some might belong to meego-dev. It should be policy what determines what goes into which mailing lists. -- Felipe Contreras _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
