On Thursday 19 August 2010 21:16:31 Foster, Dawn M wrote: > I know this is a little complicated, but I would rather solve the current > issues with meego-dev than create new issues by adding a bunch of new > developer lists that we probably don't really need. This isn't to say that > we won't create new lists (we will), but there needs to a compelling reason > for new development lists that isn't a variant of "I need a new list > because I don't like meego-dev".
I'm thinking that maybe the naming of the lists has something to do with it. I did a quick poll among colleagues and (while not obviously the most scientific method) discovered that without additional information, they too would have posted application issues in meego-dev and platform/sdk related issues in meego-sdk. Note that a similarly named list (running for several years now), maemo-devel IS used for application development issues, also acts as a sort of precedent that adds to the confusion. If it was up to me, I would rename this list to meego-platform-dev and the sdk one to meego-application-dev, unnervingly long list names be damned. But it's not up to me, so I'll end my mail here :) Best regards, Attila _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
