Hi, Dave Neary wrote: > Zhao, Fan wrote: >> Agree, and all handset test reports have been restructured like: >> http://wiki.meego.com/Quality/HandsetTestReport/UXWeekly20100706 > > Would it bother you to avoid the extra subpage level and just use > http://wiki.meego.com/Quality/UX weekly report 20100706 > please? > > Also, if you wouldn't mind using "Handset test report" instead of > "HandsetTestReport", your page names will be consistent with the rest of > the wiki.
We're still seeing namespace clutter from the UX generated pages in the wiki. Page names like http://wiki.meego.com/Quality/HandsetTestReport/UXWeekly20100908 are not consistent with the rest of the wiki, and there are now dozens of pages like this. Back in July, I suggested the following: > In general, if the testing team are going to be generating weekly test > reports, then unless there is historical interest in keeping old test > reports around, I would suggest that they be archived somewhere, and > that only the latest test reports (and, perhaps, the last test results > from a release to compare for regressions) be kept around. > > How does that sound? That got a nod of approval from Dawn at the time, but not from the test team. Dawn suggested that we could have one page with the 5 most recent test reports on the same page, and when adding a newer one, delete the oldest one. That sounds like a good idea to me. Jerry, Fan, what do you think? Cheers, Dave. -- maemo.org docsmaster Email: [email protected] Jabber: [email protected] _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
