On Sep 15, 2010, at 1:28 PM, Bernd Stramm wrote: > On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 09:13:43 -0700 > "Skarpness, Mark" <[email protected]> wrote: >> Otherwise we will miss >> the primary objective of compliance: every compliant app will run on >> every compliant device. >>> > > This is not going to be realized, if MeeGo is widely used. There will > be very different specialized devices and very general ones. > > Why should, for example, a MeeGo sailboat navigation+weather management > device support the same set of apps as a MeeGo Jazz+Mozart club > entertainment center, and the IVI used to shut up the kids in the back > of the Van? Cross-category compliance is an interesting question. Our goal is to make it possible to do this - but of course different screen sizes, input devices, etc. will lead to differences in app UI design. > > And why should the device manufacturer have control over what runs on a > device 3 years after the customer has paid for it in full? Not sure how this relates to compliance? > > Bernd > > -- > Bernd Stramm > [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
