Hi,

On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Robin Burchell <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Carsten Munk <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 2010/9/23 Andre Klapper <[email protected]>:
> > > Am Donnerstag, den 23.09.2010, 06:26 -0700 schrieb Michael Leibowitz:
> > >> What are all these NB# bugs.  I can't see them.  I don't see any
> BMC#'s.
> > >> Does this release only fix bugs that I can't see and don't know about?
> > >
> > > NB is Nokia's internal non-public bugtracker.
> > >
> >
> > Next question is why this is the only bugtracker mentioned in
> > changelog for lib'meego'touch? Aren't bugs for projects part of the
> > MeeGo project supposed to be in bugs.meego.com?
>
> This was precisely my line of thought, and the reason behind my filing
> http://bugs.meego.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4900 (complete with some
> interesting statistics of the time).
>
> It's a bit sad, in a way, that after all these years, we're still not
> over the Maemo hurdles (https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=630) -
> as pointed out recently by:
>
> http://yerga.wordpress.com/2010/09/11/nb666-my-eyes-hurt-about-nokia-internal-bugtracker/
>
> On the bright side, since I filed that report, there has been some
> marginal improvement in that there are occasionally MeeGo bugs in the
> changelogs, but I'd still not call it a good situation - especially
> given that the report itself has basically been ignored by those it
> concerns, as far as I can tell.
>
> I think, at the end of the day, it boils down to a key point: Is this
> an openly developed project, or a Nokia project? I don't think it's
> too much to ask that bugs without commercially sensitive information
> be filed on the public bugtracker specifically for that project, so
> that developers - both with different affiliations (i.e. Intel) and
> independent developers can try test/fix/generally help out.
>

Good points, but depends what you consider "commercially sensitive
information", I bet some of these bugs have cores, logs and all kind of
information that can easily leak device specs and other informations that
can be considered sensitive. At the moment I can't see a good solution to
solve this problem and agree that this should be completely open, but having
two bugtracker is far from a optimal solution IMHO.

Best regards,

-- 
Valério Valério

http://www.valeriovalerio.org


> >
> > Best regards,
> > Carsten Munk
>
> --
> Robin Burchell
> http://rburchell.com
> _______________________________________________
> MeeGo-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
>
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev

Reply via email to