Hi, Quim Gil wrote: > On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 16:49 +0200, ext Dave Neary wrote: >> What does this mean for the N900 as a reference platform for MeeGo >> development? > > Please feel free asking at the TSG tomorrow, but in the meantime:
As I said, unable to attend. In general, (just to repeat what I said to you on IRC) I don't think it's good to have an entry on a meeting agenda, a 2 minute discussion at a real-time meeting, and one line in minutes be the only way that fairly major changes like this get announced. I would have liked to see it proposed & explained here (or on maemo-community) first. If the TSG is about ratifying things that have already been discussed, then this definitely deserved some discussion, no? > Nothing new? > >> Does it mean that Nokia are basically moving on, and >> leaving Carsten in place as a life-buoy for the N900 version? > > No, it means that the guy that is doing a great job gets the > corresponding role explicitly assigned. Good to hear it. > But "casual observers" were saying that the MeeGo meritocracy requires > key roles being taken by non-Nokia and non-Intel contributors... And if that's what's happening, great. If this were associated with a reduction in resources for MeeGo on N900 on the part of Nokia, that would be a concern. If that's not happening, then great - I'm glad we cleared this up before it got to the stage of being a misunderstanding. >> Can those involved elaborate on what this would mean for N900 MeeGo >> users, please? > > For N900 users? Definitely nothing. N900 *MeeGo* users. Anyway, thanks for the information. Cheers, Dave. -- maemo.org docsmaster Email: [email protected] Jabber: [email protected] _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
