On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Jeremiah Foster < [email protected]> wrote:
> > ...snip... > > My understanding with most Open Source projects is that bugs would never be > hidden - the current policy, even if it applies to just one hardware vendor, > seems to be in direct contradiction to the Linux Foundation claims to > openness. I'd like to point out that the Linux Foundation bylaws state; > "The purposes of this corporation include promoting, protecting, and > standardizing Linux and open source software." > Then your understanding is incorrect. As I've previously explained the vast majority (if not all) highly visible open source projects keep security issues closed until they are resolved. That said, there is no reason I see that this particular bug should have been anything but open. Ryan
_______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
