On Thursday, 4 de November de 2010 23:20:28 Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On 11/4/2010 9:58 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: > > Arjan van de Ven wrote, on 11/04/2010 09:39 PM: > >> On 11/4/2010 9:00 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: > >>> Hi Folks, > >>> Wondering in what way we use Wayland in MeeGo - is this part of the > >>> plan of MeeGo 1.2? As per [1] we'd potentially be using this? Checking > >>> google, I came across [3] discussed some time back, but I guess "in > >>> development" does'nt mean we are planning on using it yet - or did I > >>> get it wrong? > >> > >> Wayland is not on the list for 1.2.. it's not ready enough for that yet. > >> > >> It is an interesting technology that we want to adopt when it's ready... > >> and help mature it as well, but right now it's just not ready yet. > > > > Thanks for the clarification. I guess you might have already seen some > > views such as [1]. > > > > [1] http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/551 > > currently Wayland is mostly done by Intel ... if Mark wants to do a > serious investment in it as well he's more than welcome...
I think Wayland and the future of display server on MeeGo is something we
should be discussing on the Unconference Day for the MeeGo Conference in two
weeks.
I'm not sure the session has been submitted, but count it in already.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
Senior Product Manager - Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks
PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
