Hi Folks, Part of the discussion in Munich OVI sprint we in the PIM team concluded that we'd like to achieve the following for better integration with either the KDE desktop/ MeeGo: 1) OVI to officially support SyncEvolution, e.g. be fully compatible with SyncEvolution through its usage of SyncML. 2) Create a reference pure qt UI for either the desktop and mobile platforms.
Now according to this group of threads on the ML, it seems that there's already collaboration going on between SyncEvolution team and Nokia / Intel. We'd like to know what's the status of this, in order to not duplicate efforts, or preferably re-use mobile version of qt ui for SyncEvolution for KDE, if a such already exists. Many thanks in advance, -Sivan On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Santosh Puranik <santosh.pura...@nokia.com> wrote: > Hello Patrick, > > ext Patrick Ohly wrote, On Thursday 04 November 2010 06:41 PM, UTC +0530: >> >> According to the patch, a new config option "omit-data-update-status" is >> added to /etc/sync/meego-syncml-conf.xml which, if set, enables some new >> additional logic. >> >> Question: is it necessary to use a meego-syncml-conf.xml which has >> omit-data-update-status == 1 to avoid the problem? The default value is >> still 0. >> > > Yes, that's correct. The ovi.com server expects that the SyncML client omits > the "Data Update Status to Server" package if there are no status to send > (when the server has no changes to send to the client). > > This "omit-data-update-status" package controls this behavior of the Buteo > SyncML stack. So, clients can enable this configuration in their stack > configuration files if needed. > > Best Regards, > Santosh > > > _______________________________________________ > MeeGo-dev mailing list > MeeGo-dev@meego.com > http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev > _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list MeeGo-dev@meego.com http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
