Hi, Peter Robinson wrote: > Is this a commercial vs open source community distro license agreement > or allowance? I'm somewhat confused! Do Linpus have an exception to > the requirements of using connman or do they provide (and are allowed > to do so) a library to provide an api glue between the two? Or are > they wrongly advertising features that they can't "legally" provide if > they wish to adhere to the current > > Presumably Linpus adhere to the LF's agreement to use the trademarks > as is currently announced or otherwise I've apparently missed > something or some process announcement.
I suspect that this is an invalid assumption on your part. I bet that Linpus didn't consider that there was any need to ask for trademark approval after this change. The interesting bit will be to see what the reaction will be now that you have (officially) made everyone aware of this potential trademark infringement. Also worth noting is that Linpus operates primarily in China, and trademark protections are not so strong there... is this something to bear in mind? I don't know. IANAL. Cheers, Dave. -- maemo.org docsmaster Email: [email protected] Jabber: [email protected] _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
