>> Is this the image we want to project?
>> 
> 
> There's no "bad image" projected by MeeGo here.  There will
> always be people who, for whatever reason, can't or don't
> comprehend what's in front of them.  In my estimation the
> MeeGo project has made very clear what it is and isn't, and
> the message is being refined as needed.
> 
> In this case, I could see room for some improvement. instead
> of just "(Google Chrome Browser)", maybe the link should say
> "(includes Google Chrome Browser)" to make the situation a bit
> clearer. 

Yes, the way that one works out ends up appearing a little unbalanced
in favor of one specific component.

This wording isn't snappy enough to be usable, but this is what
we really mean:

1.  unsrestricted image
2.  image with more functionality, requires one-time acceptance of one or more 
EULAs

Maybe someone's smart enough to figure a way to express that
in a better way...

_______________________________________________
MeeGo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev

Reply via email to