On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Clark, Joel <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Anyone who looks at www.meego.com can easily see there are several MeeGo 
> releases which do not say (or include) "Google Chrome Browser".  In fact the 
> Chrome Browser choice is at the bottom of the list.
>

Yes, it's helpful that there are choices besides the Chrome browser. I
seem to recall that in one of the first iterations of MeeGo, both the
Free and non-Free builds got equal billing, so I think it's good
progress that we're seeing a little clearer delineation between the
default build and the Google build.

> Each product/device/vertical is free to choose whichever browser they want.

>  What the netbook folks have chosen as an optional release for MeeGo 1.0 
> (Chrome) has little bearing on what the other devices or Meego derived 
> products may choose.

What the netbook folks choose may not influence what other MeeGo
developers choose, but it may influence what visitors to the site see
and what they perceive about the project. I think that's the primary
concern when people see the name "Google" associated with certain
builds of MeeGo, and when people see a non-FOSS build.

> Several browsers have been included in MeeGo including firefox, chromium and 
> fennec. However as everyone has noted, those browsers did not required a 
> EULA, so they have not been as noticeable as Chrome is for Netbooks.

Yes, Firefox, Chromium, and Fennec do not have a EULA on them. But
that's not just a coincidence: those browser are FOSS, while Chrome is
not.

> Just take a look as some of the other device releases and you will see this.  
> I'm sure the option for a Chrome download is only there because it was highly 
> desirable to many folks.

That seems like a possible explanation for the Chrome build, but I
really don't know the who-and-why of that decision. Does Chrome
provide significantly more functionality than Chromium?

> We should be happy MeeGo appeals to such a diverse community and champion 
> inclusion over exclusion.
>

I agree that we should try to make the MeeGo platform as flexible and
inclusive as possible. But if there is brand confusion about MeeGo and
Google here, it may be prudent to examine the inclusion of software
that leads to such confusion.

I also think that it may be helpful to define what proprietary
software may be included into official MeeGo builds. The MeeGo "About"
page says that "MeeGo is an open source, Linux project which brings
together the Moblin project, headed up by Intel, and Maemo, by Nokia,
into a single open source activity." If the project decides to include
a proprietary component in an officially-provided build, then it would
be nice to provide some justification for the departure from (as
others have called it) "pure Open Source."


Cheers,
--R
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev

Reply via email to