> On 3/7/2011 3:33 PM, [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Let's define what we want, create a Meego-standardized test bench, > > we can do many things that delay MeeGo moving forward. > We're not going to do that.
If EDF fails as well a year later because you did not set proper requirements and it won't match the problem, then you delay Meego even more. Without tests and facts it is just another bet. > Time has come and gone for this to be a discussion; this is a decision. True that it has been too long discussion. I don't know how decisions are made in Meego nowadays, but this has all chances to become a poor one (not because EDF). You can move forward with EDF for the next release(s), but please establish proper criteria. I still want to see the test cases and data sets against which we will measure EDF or anything else, otherwise we will eternally make the same mistakes. This would also give tracker a chance to improve in the background, against now clear requirements. Regards, Zoltan
_______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev http://wiki.meego.com/Mailing_list_guidelines
