On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 11:58 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > From: ext Martyn Russell [[email protected]] > Sent: 08 March 2011 13:53 > >> As you can imagine, if you want to be able to query, insert and merge >> 120k of contracts, you really can't have your cake and eat it so to >> speak without some sacrifices one way or another. > > That's not true. > > Nothing prevents from having 2 DB, where the first one is the usual (could be > considered as cache) > and the other is much larger and used only in case the first search fails. > Maybe with the explicit consent from the user to proceed with such > expensive operation. > > Obviously there are problems of keeping the DBs in synch, but they do not > seem impossible to solve, for example deferring the work to a later time when > the device is idle and connected to a power source.
I thought tracker already supported indexing a e-d-s data store anyway. Peter _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev http://wiki.meego.com/Mailing_list_guidelines
