Moving the thread to meego-dev. I looked deeper into this QMF promotion. Until now,we (MeeGo) used a modified version that includes libaccount/libsignon integration. Since the SR#15232, we're using the upstream QMF version and by extension, dropped the integration.
My questions: 1. Is it an architecture team decision? 2. Why use an older QMF upstream version? (and introduce epoch) 3. What about the applications using QMF libaccount/libsignon integration? 4. Why nobody took the time to notify MeeGo's QMF maintainer? In OBS, the development project for QMF is devel:qt-mtf and this SR comes from devel:ux. Cheers, Fathi ________________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of ext [email protected] [[email protected]] Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 7:08 PM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [meego-packaging] [meego-commits] 15232 accepted: Trunk:Testing/qmf > True - but all these packages have been test as a bundle in devel:ux. Sorry > about the confusion. But you have pushed an older version of QMF: http://build.meego.com/request/show/15232 We use 1.0.7~2011w06 since a month. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 9:52 AM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [meego-packaging] [meego-commits] 15232 accepted: Trunk:Testing/qmf Promoting from devel:ux to Trunk:Testing ? qmf is developed in devel:qt-mtf. ________________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of ext Prajwal Mohan [[email protected]] Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 6:37 PM To: Prajwal Mohan Cc: [email protected] Subject: [meego-commits] 15232 accepted: Trunk:Testing/qmf Hi Prajwal Mohan, The following change has been accepted. See the changelog below. Comments: ok Thanks, MeeGo Release Engineering Team [This message was auto-generated] --- Request #15232: submit: devel:ux/qmf(r1) -> Trunk:Testing/qmf Message: Promoting qmf to Trunk:Testing State: accepted 2011-03-25T09:37:57 praj Comment: ok Review: new peter None None None review History: new 2011-03-25T09:37:48 praj review 2011-03-25T05:33:52 peter new 2011-03-25T02:37:22 praj _______________________________________________ MeeGo-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-commits _______________________________________________ MeeGo-packaging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-packaging _______________________________________________ MeeGo-packaging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-packaging _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev http://wiki.meego.com/Mailing_list_guidelines
