On 03/29/2011 02:05 AM, Ryan Ware wrote:
On 03/25/2011 12:33 AM, Michael Przybilski wrote:
Since the code is in gitorious and also the bug-fixes have been done in the
MeeGo bugzilla, I think it only makes sense to also have the discussions in
public. That said, I'd suggest that it might be better to have this in the
MeeGo-security ml instead.
If the group feels that MeeGo-Security-Discussion is a better place for this, I
don't have a problem with it.
I don't think it is. The Accounts part has nothing to do with security, while
the SSO part is just a client for the security framework, and can be configured
to work without any security functionality (and still be useful).
That said, continuing to have these discussions on
an internal only mail list is problematic. It does not allow us to discuss the
shortcomings and issues with the current Accounts & SSO solution with the people
that are developing it.
100% agree.
Ciao,
Alberto
--
http://blog.mardy.it <-- geek in un lingua international!
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
http://wiki.meego.com/Mailing_list_guidelines
