On 04/02/2011 02:38 PM, Robin Burchell wrote:
Hi Rusty,
On 02/04/11 22:11, Rusty Lynch wrote:
On 04/02/2011 12:57 PM, Robin Burchell wrote:
Hi,
Whilst working on meego-ux-components[0], I happened to notice there
seems to be quite a bit of confusion over licensing.
>
The project is LGPL. The files marked as Apache were moved over from
meegolabs and were supposed to have their license headers corrected (so
just an oversight), and it was also just an oversight not to apply the
license header to the *indicator* files.
OK. There are some other files in the tree also lacking headers, I would
try make a list, but I figure that's just duplicating the work of
whoever fixes this.
Can I ask why that single project is differently licensed?
We wanted to match the license used by Qt components to make it easier
evolve the implementation with qt components.
--rusty
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
http://wiki.meego.com/Mailing_list_guidelines
