On 26 April 2011 06:56, Carsten Munk <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue Apr 26 2011 05:38:56 AM CEST, Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On 4/25/2011 7:28 PM, Zhao, Juan J wrote: >> > On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 06:35 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote: >> > > On 4/25/2011 1:24 AM, Zhao, Juan J wrote: >> > > > Hi there, >> > > > >> > > > Is there any plane for clutter or mutter to be configured to >> > > > use gles here? >> > > > >> > > > Would anybody share the experience about this? >> > > > >> > > why would there be a plan for this ??? >> > > >> > For embeded system, gles will show better performance than gl desktop. >> > And there are still some embeded platform choose mutter as its window >> > manager. So I think this window manager should move to gles. >> >> pretty much all meego platforms use the Qt/QML stack, with netbook >> having the core pieces still as legacy... >> ... don't see the point mucking with the legacy with no upside and only >> potential downsides.... > At least the currently being pushed MeeGo TV reference UI seems to use > clutter/mutter still, so not totally legacy. > > /carsten
Carsten is correct TV reference UI (stripped XBMC), will use mutter due to GDL capabilities implemented by it. Is there any benchmarks to show GLES performs better than GL in platforms supporting both like the SGX535? -- Brendan Le Foll http://www.madeo.co.uk _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev http://wiki.meego.com/Mailing_list_guidelines
