On 03/05/11 20:54, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On 5/3/2011 9:00 AM, Martin Grimme wrote:
Hi,
from all this I gather that if Nokia would release a MeeGo tablet,
for that tablet to be called "MeeGo" it needs to be meego compliant.
we'd have two incompatible sets of tablet apps. Those that use MeeGo
UX Components, and those that use Qt Components, with either tablet
not able to run the other framework.
today, compliance does not yet cover the components, but you're making a
very good case that it should....
That's what I was sort of hinting at earlier, I think it'd be a good
idea. Nothing also prevents us (MeeGo the project) or vendors from
extending this with _additional_ components for our own use, but the
basic stuff being guarenteed to work for application developers across
devices should be a must.
This bug might be worth a read:
http://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTCOMPONENTS-200
--
Robin Burchell
http://rburchell.com
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
http://wiki.meego.com/Mailing_list_guidelines
