On Fr, 2011-05-13 at 14:19 +0100, Dumez, Christophe wrote: > Hi, > > Please find attached a patch for QtContact-EDS backend: > --- > [PATCH] QContactEBook::initAddressBook() Method reworked > > Properly unref the query object to avoid a memory > leak. Make sure we ask only for user ids from > the EBookView as an optimization. > ---
Typically I don' like mixing such unrelated changes in a single commit, but I merged anyway. > I'm still experiencing EDS problems with the stress test (asynchronous > add/remove failing). I mailed the evolution-hackers about it: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg04404.html For those not following that list: the root cause turned out to be the same performance bug in EDS which was observed in the Tracker/EDS performance comparison. I looked more closely this morning and fixed it by properly initializing libdb: it needs to be told that there will be concurrent reads and writes. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev http://wiki.meego.com/Mailing_list_guidelines
