Hello Michael, > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael > Hasselmann > Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 7:44 AM > To: [email protected] List > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: [MeeGo-dev] Poor decision making in MeeGo, again ... > > Hi, > > I wondered why bugs for our component, the virtual keyboard, were moved > to newly created components without prior announcement, nor > explanations. > > Turned out it was the execution of BMC#19369. Now, starting to move bugs > to entirely new components without asking/commenting is somewhat rude > in > itself, as it completely bypasses the triaging efforts of the original > bug component owner. > > If I hadn't been informed about above bug by accident, then I would have > thought that someone is using MeeGo's bugzilla as a personal playground > for new ideas. Not cool. > > Actually, a good way to piss off your contributors, since you just broke > my (developer's) workflow. Again. > > Hiding behind your bosses as in: > > "especially this is actually requested by MeeGo lead engineers and > architect" (https://bugs.meego.com/show_bug.cgi?id=19369#c8) > > simply doesn't work here. This is not your typical corporate, > I-dont-want-to-think-for-myself environment. *You* take the > responsibility for *your* actions. Always. > > Discussing this issue on the relevant mailing list (Read: Where the > developers are. Hint: It's not the QA ML) would have been the minimum > requirement. > > And once a decision is made, you also need to publicly announce it. No > you cannot expect me (or anyone else who is *not* in your QA team) to > read your miles-long thread on your QA ML > (http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg01561.htm > l). I > really have more important stuff to do (like, uh, actually fixing bugs > for you so that your QA work stays relevant). I want the executive > summary. Again, minimum requirement for stuff that potentially affects > everyone contributing to MeeGo. You could have used news.meego.com > even. > > If we see MeeGo as an open community then we'd better start to act > accordingly. This seemingly arbitrary decision-making (followed by > top-down no-questions-asked execution) needs to die. > > regards, > Michael (who wasn't amused when he couldn't find certain input method > bugs any longer) >
I remembered Wanshuang announced the change previously. Here is the link http://lists.meego.com/pipermail/meego-qa/2011-June/001958.html thanks, Elva _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev http://wiki.meego.com/Mailing_list_guidelines
