On Friday, 30 de September de 2011 09:24:04 Alison Chaiken wrote: > LiFo owns "MeeGo" and won't let us the name, to be sure, > but we can call it "OpenMobMo" or "OpenMaeLin" if you like. (That > joke is bound to have turned someone's stomach.)
Has anyone asked the LF if we can continue the project, using the trademark,
under the same guidance and spirit as it had one week ago?
I wouldn't dismiss the name so quickly...
> But seriously, if the worst case occurs and Tizen bears nearly no
> resemblance to MeeGo, why shouldn't we consider working on Qt
> development with Ubuntu Core, which is focused on ARM? With
> Intel's possible complete departure, MeeGo development on Atom may
> completely stop, while Ubuntu Core is completely focused on ARM.
> Yes, I know that would mean going back to .deb's, and I am completely
> familiar with what a PITA that would be, but if we do nothing as a
> community, MeeGo is about to die.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list MeeGo-dev@meego.com http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev http://wiki.meego.com/Mailing_list_guidelines
