On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Michael Hasselmann <micha...@openismus.com> wrote: > On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 10:13 -0500, Gabriel Beddingfield wrote: >> With Intel removing the lion's share of those developer resources... >> it would be foolish to continue that failed approach. It sets >> everyone up for failure. > > I feel as if you over-estimate Intel's software development efforts for > MeeGo.
Well... MeeGo loses Auke... and that's pretty darn big IMHO. :-) I'm not going to bicker over head count or even quality. You wanna support 5 verticals, go ahead. Make us all proud. I think it's a plan for failure. <full_disclosure> I'm all talk. At this moment, and for the past few months, I can't commit any time to MeeGo (or even Tizen). But I really dig MeeGo for several reasons... mostly the native/Qt API's... so I hope(d) to see it succeed as a main-stream mobile OS. </full_disclosure> -gabriel _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list MeeGo-dev@meego.com http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev http://wiki.meego.com/Mailing_list_guidelines
