----- Message d'origine ----- > On 14/10/10 18:25, [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > #meego-dev and #meego are pretty quiet at times, I think I'd rather > see > > > them used more instead for now, instead of dispersing everyone to > highly > > > specialized channels. > > > > It's up to the the community to make #meego and #meego-dev active. > > eh? You are the community. Yes, and participate in discussion I'm interested in. These channels doesn't contain any :)
do you mind if I can choose the channels I want to go and the discussions I want to participate? > > So far, we have ~90 people on these channels and as you noticed, > they're quiet. > > I prefer to go in a channel with less people but active on a topic I'm > interested in. > > If meego-packaging was present and active then I'd say fair enough. > But it's not. Perfect example of fairness. The channel exists since 24h. > meego-dev is already primarily about building, packaging and policy. I > know > because that's where the nokia OBS team hangs out. Like 90 other people :) that doesn't make it a useful channel. > And I really think the idea of taking policy and guidelines to a channel > with > less people seems rather... counterproductive. Feel free to join if you're interested in _packaging_ > > > So no, I personally would not support this. > > > > I'm supporting the initiative. Let's give it a try and see if it's > useful instead > > of trying to kill it even before it's born. If the channel isn't > useful, it will die by itself. > > Please kill it. > David > > -- > "Don't worry, you'll be fine; I saw it work in a cartoon once..." > _______________________________________________ > MeeGo-packaging mailing list > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-packaging >
_______________________________________________ MeeGo-packaging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-packaging
