On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 15:43 +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > note that I had mentionned some similar issues back in October [0], in > meego-dev. > > I was not satisfied by the answers back then, and I'm really not comfortable > with this way of treating with other upstreams: I don't think it's correct > to hijack a project's name and codebase. > > Looking forward to enlightenment statements on those actions; cheers,
Ironically I was involved in the gnome-control-center work. That is less of a fork and more a slight stabilsation of work that was happening in master but due to release schedules wouldn't be stable upstream before we needed it. We worked with upstream -- and in some parts were upstream -- so whilst it looked a bit odd it wasn't hostile and in an ideal world the branch would disappear in the next release. Ross -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ MeeGo-packaging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-packaging
