Little humble opinion > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Andre Klapper > Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 8:58 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Meego-qa] [MeeGo-dev] Poor decision making in MeeGo, again ... > > On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 11:44 +0800, Zhao, Fan wrote: > > It's originally sent to meego-qa and meego-release mailing lists. > > ...which didn't address all parties that were and are affected by this > decision. Not the first time this happens.
Was there any body realize the potential risk/impact of this to the other parties (let's say meego-dev@ mailing list here) when the original mail of this change sent out? If yes, why nobody (especially EM guys)popped up his/her concern at the time when he/she received the mail or forwarded it to other parties? If no, then my comments below....... > > > I just forwarded it to meego-dev mailing list in case some dev didn't > > subscribe these 2 mailing list. > > Does that imply that you expect developers to be subscribed to -qa or > -releases? Because I wouldn't... I think we should thanks for Michael's mail that let us know the impact to them(if somebody think he/she knew this, then why didn't you raise it up ahead of time?) and also at least we should thanks Fan for forwarding this mail to meego-dev which didn't done by others or before others did it. (if anybody else already did it before Fan did, I would say sorry to him/her :) ) > > andre > -- > Andre Klapper (maemo.org bugmaster) > http://www.openismus.com > So anyway, on top of raise up question(or challenges), hope more people can come up with his/her suggestions/ideas about how to make things better, how to solve the problem, do more contribution to meego and all the talents in meego project. Thanks, Jason _______________________________________________ MeeGo-qa mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-qa
